![]() What the teacher sees is that the jobs they have received after learning to use AI are much better than those received in the past, done by students from the grassroots. “Getting an AI to produce meaningful content requires both subject matter expertise and skill.” According to the professor, the mediocre results that teachers usually see when students copy and paste from ChatGPT it’s because students don’t make an effort actually working with the chatbot. To help students maximize their use of AI, Mollick provided them with a guide to using AI for writing. And it incorrectly identifies writing as AI-made 9% of the time. The tool from OpenAI itself only detects ChatGPT writing 26% of the time. You can’t accuse students of cheating based on any online tools. Important: There is no reliable way of detecting ChatGPT writing. Besides, students who added their own knowledge and co-edited writing with ChatGPT got the best results. The teacher wanted the search to be refined: if other, more precise instructions were used, the students could improve the results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |